In the instance of a run-down resulting from obstruction, what is the result for the obstructed runner?

When a play involves obstruction, the rules dictate that the obstructed runner is entitled to advance at least one base. This is to ensure that the runner does not suffer a penalty due to the obstruction that interfered with their ability to play the game fairly. In the case of obstruction, the umpire's role is to assess the situation and provide the obstructed runner with the opportunity to advance.

If the obstruction occurs while the play is live, the umpire has discretion on how far the runner can advance based on the circumstances of the play. In most cases, the intent is to allow the runner to gain the base they were attempting to reach at the time of the obstruction, and possibly more if they appear to have the ability to do so safely. This provision is in place to maintain the integrity of the game and to protect all players from unfair conditions that arise from obstruction.

In contrast, declaring the runner out immediately would negate their right to advance, and allowing the runner to go back and touch the base safely does not appropriately address the disruption caused by the obstruction. Additionally, stating that the run cannot count due to the obstruction does not align with the rules, as a valid approach is taken to rectify the situation for the obstructed runner.